<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pro Liberi &#187; Background</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pro-liberi.com/category/background/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com</link>
	<description>Looking to the future for our species and showing how Technology will save us if Politics doesn't doom us first</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 17:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Black Hole Physics makes my head hurt</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2010/06/25/black-hole-physics-makes-my-head-hurt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2010/06/25/black-hole-physics-makes-my-head-hurt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2010/06/25/black-hole-physics-makes-my-head-hurt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know that advanced physics is a very complicated subject. I&#8217;m also aware that I&#8217;m not even an amateur when it comes to black holes and the physics involved, I&#8217;m merely an interested fiddler. I do however, understand the basic physical principles behind many things.</p> <p>For example, I understand about planets being formed because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that advanced physics is a very complicated subject.  I&#8217;m also aware that I&#8217;m not even an amateur when it comes to black holes and the physics involved, I&#8217;m merely an interested fiddler.    I do however, understand the basic physical principles behind many things.</p>
<p>For example, I understand about planets being formed because mass clumps together, I understand that the gravity there can cause it to compress and heat up, I understand black holes being formed because there is somuch mass that the whole thing collapses and compresses to a very small space.   I also understand how the gravity well created by a black hole won&#8217;t allow anything to escape, even light, and thus we have an event horizon.  The line in space past which light can&#8217;t escape where before it can.</p>
<p>Now in my simple mind we should be able to lower some sensors on a bit of rope beyond the event horizon and see what is there.  Ok, It&#8217;ll have to be strong rope but the principle is still the same.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is how we can change some parameters such as angular velocity and <a title="How To Destroy A Black Hole" href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/25316/" target="_blank">make the event horizon vanish</a>.    What sort of energy requirement is that going to take?    But isn&#8217;t that simply spinning the black hole to reduce it&#8217;s gravity anyway?    Simply moving the event horizon nearing the singularity itself.   Still leaving the singularity shrouded though.    And if you made the angular velocity sufficient to remove the event horizon surely it wouldn&#8217;t be a black hole then?  It&#8217;ll just be a large spinning mass on the verge of being a black hole.     Better get working on a very long yet stong piece of string then if you want to see beyond the event horizon.</p>
<p>I was particularly impressed with the phrase &#8216;Getting rid of the event horizon is simply a question of increasing the angular momentum and &#8230;..&#8217;     A new definition of the word simply I fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2010/06/25/black-hole-physics-makes-my-head-hurt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do relationships work?</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/08/17/how-do-relationships-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/08/17/how-do-relationships-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/08/17/how-do-relationships-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you put a woman on a pedestal and try to protect her from the rat race, you are a male chauvinist. If you stay home and do the housework, you are a pansy.</p> <p>If you work too hard, there is never any time for her. If you don&#8217;t work enough, you are a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you put a woman on a pedestal and try to protect her from the rat race, you are a male chauvinist.<br />
If you stay home and do the housework, you are a pansy.</p>
<p>If you work too hard, there is never any time for her.<br />
If you don&#8217;t work enough, you are a good-for-nothing bum.</p>
<p>If she has a boring repetitive job with low pay, it is exploitation.<br />
If you have a boring repetitive job with low pay, you should get off your lazy behind and find something better.</p>
<p>If you get a promotion ahead of her, that is favouritism.<br />
If she gets a job ahead of you, its affirmative action.</p>
<p>If you mention how nice she look sits, it is sexual harassment.<br />
If you keep quiet, its male indifference.</p>
<p>If you cry, you are a wimp.<br />
If you don&#8217;t, you are an insensitive bastard.</p>
<p>If you make a decision without consulting her, you are a chauvinist.<br />
If she makes a decision without consulting you, she is a liberated woman.</p>
<p>If you ask her to do something she doesn&#8217;t enjoy, that is domination.<br />
If she asks you, it&#8217;s a favor.</p>
<p>If you appreciate the female form, you are a pervert.<br />
If you don&#8217;t, you are gay.</p>
<p>If you like a woman to shave her legs, wear sexy lingerie and keep in shape, you are sexist.<br />
If you don&#8217;t, you are unromantic.</p>
<p>If you try to keep yourself in shape, you are vain.<br />
If you don&#8217;t, you are a slob.</p>
<p>If you buy her flowers, you are after something.<br />
If you don&#8217;t, you are not thoughtful.</p>
<p>If you are proud of your achievements, you are full of yourself.<br />
If you are not, you are not ambitious.</p>
<p>If she has a headache, she is tired.<br />
If you have a headache, you don&#8217;t love her anymore.</p>
<p>If you want it too often, you are over sexed.<br />
If you don&#8217;t, there must be someone else.</p></blockquote>
<p>It is a joke but like all jokes built on truth. So what do we learn from all this? Well we learn that you can&#8217;t win no matter what you do. You both need to be looking at things from the same direction so that you see the same things. Then you will be happy. Not many couples actually do this. Most of us have to do a bit of compromising and adapt to the relationships requirements. This compromise is necessary but it is where we get everything wrong.</p>
<p>Every person has an invisible mental list of their needs, wants and don&#8217;t cares. The needs must be met to keep them happy where as the wants are simply the icing on the cake the don&#8217;t cares you don&#8217;t even think about. Not having your needs met leads to unhappiness and eventually the destruction of the relationship for you. Not having wants met usually means you adapt to replace those wants with attainable wants but still dream about them when you can. Defining these lists is an ongoing process throughout your life and when push comes to shove you can find that sometimes they change due to circumstances. Usually because you didn&#8217;t actually really think about them properly and sometimes it is because you are getting older and your requirements have changed. Needs lists are usually short while the wants list is much longer. Don&#8217;t cares is everything else on the planet so is too big to even quantify and is rarely discussed.</p>
<p>For example you may have a need for a redhead with big boobs. You also want sex every day. You meet someone who meets this and you get on well eventually getting married. Then you discover she has dyed her hair and she is really a brunette and her boobs are falsies. Do you divorce her? Of course not, well not generally, because the red hair and the boobs were false needs. She had what was needed and it wasn&#8217;t even on the list.</p>
<p>Usually though the issue is one of trust or behavior. She wants the nice guy with the easy come easy go attitude but doesn&#8217;t like the fact he won&#8217;t settle with one woman. So she decides she will get closest to him and she can put up with his womanizing. She puts faithfulness down as a want as she believes she can handle it. It leads to arguments, getting pregnant to tie him in, one of them killing the other or just breaking up all because she needs him to be faithful and eventually it wears her down. Swap the sexes in all these examples if you wish as they work both ways.</p>
<p>This means that you need to be honest from the outset. Tell it as it is but at the same time bear in mind you are dealing with another human being, one that deserves respect so you need to be careful in your choice of words. You also need to take into consideration where you are on the relationship ladder so you don&#8217;t frighten them off with your wants of kinky sex with midgets. Each relationship has a ladder and at each rung certain things become available. A bit like games where when you master one skill other options become available. The first rung is where you actually are introduced or bump into the person and depending on the options taken and the result you could move on to the second and so on. Either continually moving up the ladder or jumping off onto another ladder.</p>
<p>So while you are being honest you are also relying on your partner to be honest as well. After all if there is something on their needs that you just cannot meet then ultimately that relationship is in trouble. While they fool themselves that it is a want or something that you will change then you are basically living a lie. It leads to distrust and arguments. But you cannot keep asking questions to ensure that you are all on the same page as repeated questions makes it sound like you don&#8217;t believe them and is associated with jealousy. Also if you are at the point of moving between different rungs of the ladder then questions can be taken out of context and can frighten some off.</p>
<p>With all this it&#8217;s a wonder that relationships work at all. Most people have few needs, honesty, trust, treated fairly, a couple of brain cells and decent conversation. Wants range from kinky sex to being left alone for hours on end. It&#8217;s only because we are so adaptable that relationships last any length of time at all.</p>
<p>However, we know that relationships nowadays are not lasting as long as they used to. Why is that? Well in my highly biased viewpoint it is because of the changes wrought in society by our successive governments means that despite the fact you never actually really had anything in common with someone else that one of you had a child which is the only ticket you need for a life on someone else&#8217;s tab. It means you can have all the benefits of having a relationship but without actually having to put up with him. So taking the step, what was a big deal long ago, of having a baby is nowhere near as risky as it was. So in an attempt to force him to meet your needs when he wasn&#8217;t before you make a choice for all three of you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s actually a wonder and a sign of how adaptable people are than any long term relationships work at all.</p>
<p>As a matter of interest though. It does explain how the bad boys get so much nookie. Girls like bad boys, they are looking for protectors and someone that will ensure they are kept well. Bad guys appear tough and exciting. That and the fact they are willing to lie like crazy means that they can always ensure that they appear to be meeting their women&#8217;s needs. It doesn&#8217;t matter it is a lie because she believes it and by the time she finds out the truth he will be ready to move on to the next. Lying gives short term gains because telling the truth means that they would miss out to the decent ones who tell the truth.</p>
<p>Maybe this is a reflection on why our society is going downhill. All the bad guys are having the babies, with multiple mothers, and not giving them positive role models as they drink and smoke their way through their dole money while the kids grow up whilst the couples we should be encouraging and the ones paying for it all are having only one or two children and struggling to make ends meet. I&#8217;m not convinced either that this is all a bad thing when you look at the bunch of wimps the rest of us have become.</p>
<p>Anyway, my view is simple. I&#8217;ve decided that I&#8217;m too opinionated to keep an intelligent woman going so I&#8217;ll just have to settle for a less argumentative one that will put up with my quirks. I&#8217;m honest and what you see is what you get so as long as that is OK at the start it will cut down on the arguments. The reason I can&#8217;t lie is that I&#8217;ve found that if I make myself to be someone else there is always something wrong with that so I get earache for being something I&#8217;m not and I have the hassle of remembering and keeping my lies together. If I am who I am I still get earache but at least I don&#8217;t have to worry if it&#8217;s because I&#8217;ve been caught out or it&#8217;s the alter ego I know it&#8217;s me. Nice and simple.</p>
<p>So I suggest that those who want to build and keep a long and lasting relationship be honest with each other, excluding is her ass fat in this, it&#8217;s always a trick question, be trustworthy, you always get caught out, and find things you can do together and each have something you can do on your own and keep talking to each other, you don&#8217;t always have to agree, it&#8217;s better if you don&#8217;t but don&#8217;t fall out over things. Remember and be clear on both your needs. Keep the basic and the rest will fall into place depending on both your needs. Nothing too complicated with that is there.</p>
<p>Taking all this into consideration I really wonder how any of our species have managed to have any long term relationships at all. We must all have very few needs and the ability to ignore facts staring us in the face.  Oh wait! A definition of our society as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/08/17/how-do-relationships-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we are all Socialists at heart</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/27/why-we-are-all-socialists-at-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/27/why-we-are-all-socialists-at-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/27/why-we-are-all-socialists-at-heart/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We have all heard the phrase ‘If you are young and not a Socialist you have no heart and if you are old and not a Conservative you have no brains’.</p> <p>My take on that is that you are young and have no money you want some and feel others in your situation deserve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have all heard the phrase ‘If you are young and not a Socialist you have no heart and if you are old and not a Conservative you have no brains’.</p>
<p>My take on that is that you are young and have no money you want some and feel others in your situation deserve some as well from all those that have plenty. That’s the Socialist way. Then as you have worked your way through life to scrimp and save and bring up a family you want to keep that which you have sweated and worked so hard for.</p>
<p>If that was true then our love for socialism would be short because there are a lot more older people than younger people and that ratio is increasing. So why does Socialism get so many supporters every generation or so?</p>
<p>Well, I think that it our nature to be caring to others. Now before you laugh think about it. We are selfish creatures. We have needs and wants.</p>
<p>Examples of needs are food, shelter and protection. Examples of wants are to have friends, procreate and have nice toys. Both basic lists and everyone will have different views on what should be in there.</p>
<p>So when our needs are not being met we hold on tightly to what we have, sharing with no one and charity is out of the question. Once our needs are met and we feel comfortable that it will continue to do so then we are willing to share some things with others close to us and spend money on status stuff like toys and presents for the other sex. Then once we feel comfortable that our needs and wants are met we give more to others including charity and want to help others less fortunate. Our caring side is freed by because we no longer need to be totally selfish and we do like to help people where we can.</p>
<p>This is why we had wealthy landowners in the past providing poorhouses, medical care and schools. We have people now who provide law and medical care free of charge to poor people outside the legislation that requires it. Sometimes barely making a living themselves, in comparison to others of their skill sets. Bill Gates as his ilk providing aid to Africa all with their own money. Unlike our government which, provides aid to Africa etc. with borrowed money. Who in their right mind borrows money to give away whilst your own people, those you are supposed to be working for, are left with the ever increasing bills and to rub salt in the wounds the people that need the aid where we send it don’t get it either as it’s largely swallowed up by middlemen.</p>
<p>So we elect a Socialist government because they say they will create Social Justice and that is where it goes wrong because there is no such thing as Social Justice. It just creates injustice because we all have different requirement on what we consider to be enough for our needs and sliding scales on what we consider to be enough for our wants. Some think if your needs are met then you should help others, others who may have few needs think that our needs are being selfish and we should settle for less. Some of us have bigger, more expensive houses, others have more kids, others have expensive hobbies and so the amount we want to share differs. That isn’t good enough for those who feel strongly enough about what they call social justice and they raise and support champions who are willing to take via force from the others what they do not want to give willingly. They don’t see that it will impact them as, after all, they are not rich or even well off, and anyway it’s just a bit more. Thus Socialists rise to power to force people to do what they did freely before and because they are inefficient they destroy the economy in the process of making their ideal world and turn those that gave into people fighting to hold on to everything as they no longer can meet their needs and wants and need to keep what they have just to meet their own requirements. Real charity for others drops. It takes a while but it always happens. Then their support goes and we are back at the beginning again. Economy in bad shape. People sticking in local communities and having no interest in anyone else no matter how badly off they are. Socialism proved, yet again, that it doesn’t work and people wondering why we even thought it would.</p>
<p>So in quite a few years when the debts are paid and we have amassed some more wealth we will do the exactly the same thing again and they will again lead the country into the same situation.</p>
<p>Empty heads vote Socialists in and empty pockets vote them out.</p>
<p>The only real cure is education. The Socialists know that and that’s why they fill the schools with so many socialist drones and ensure that they are poorly educated. Sure kids leave with good grades but today 5 grade ‘A’s will get you a job flipping burgers from a street stand and anything less means you can’t read or write. It’s ‘A*’s that count now, anything less means they are indoctrinated into obeying the authority of that state and will put up with anything it does to them.</p>
<p>We must change it. We need to teach the basics. Maths, English, Basic Economics (at the very least it will help them manage their finances) and Basic Logical Thinking. How to work things out from facts and take less on faith. Question what is said and does it make sense. Too often even the brightest among us takes a lot on faith. I’ve done it myself.</p>
<p>Although it may not help though. The need to help others can override logic. Although one day we will have enough wealth to cover all our social programmes. I think we were almost there if we changed the way we looked at certain things.  By looking at each issue differently and using logic we could make them manageable. Maybe next time we have some spare pennies.</p>
<p>Or if we develop our FTL capability we could we off on our ‘Wagontrain to the skies’ where we will probably do the same things there once we reach that point in society.</p>
<p>Human nature is just too strong to overcome with legislation and/or logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/27/why-we-are-all-socialists-at-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ants more human than I thought</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/14/ants-more-human-than-i-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/14/ants-more-human-than-i-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/14/ants-more-human-than-i-thought/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the past I have said that Socialism doesn&#8217;t work because we are not like ants and we are inherently selfish.   Socialism requires the drones to sacrifice something of themselves in some way so the whole colony benefits.   Ants will all sacrifice their lives for the colony.</p> <p>Now it appears that those willing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past I have said that Socialism doesn&#8217;t work because we are not like ants and we are inherently selfish.   Socialism requires the drones to sacrifice something of themselves in some way so the whole colony benefits.   Ants will all sacrifice their lives for the colony.</p>
<p>Now it appears that those willing to sacrifice themselves for their own colonies are not so willing to do the same for other colonies.  To the extent that they mutiny and sabotage the colony when they are enslaved.   Read <a title="Slave ants keep a taste for revenge" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227034.400-slave-ants-keep-a-taste-for-revenge.html" target="_blank">here</a>.   Ants are more like humans than I thought.</p>
<p>Of course ants don&#8217;t look at other ants watching Jeremy Kyle and benefiting from their labour then changing their minds or every colony would be in turmoil like we are under a Socialist government.</p>
<p>Those <a title="Base instincts" href="http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/03/16/base-instincts/" target="_blank">base instincts</a> cover more of the animal kingdom than I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/14/ants-more-human-than-i-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We are already a surveillance state</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/11/we-are-already-a-surveillance-state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/11/we-are-already-a-surveillance-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/11/we-are-already-a-surveillance-state/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Technology is a double edged sword. Stalin would have loved the database and analysis technology available today and it’s got to the stage where even the most docile among us is aware of what is going on and feeling a glimmer of concern.</p> <p>The latest bit of legislation, the Internet addresses being recorded, although [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology is a double edged sword. Stalin would have loved the database and analysis technology available today and it’s got to the stage where even the most docile among us is aware of what is going on and feeling a glimmer of concern.</p>
<p>The latest bit of legislation, the Internet addresses being recorded, although talked about all out of proportion is only the latest bit of surveillance by our Police state and not even the most dangerous. I suspect it is the straw that broke the camel’s back though.</p>
<p>I’ve looked around since my ‘<a title="Throwing shoes in the machines" href="http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/08/throwing-shoes-in-the-machines/" target="_blank">shoes in the machines</a>&#8216; post and looked to see what we can do. Thinking about it made me realise how far we already are down the path so I though I should put a stake in the ground first. So here we go.</p>
<p>For years we have been monitored and recorded, for our own good, and of course to make sure we have paid all we can.</p>
<p>The <a title="Police National Computer" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_National_Computer" target="_blank">PNC</a> (Police National Computer) has known about any interface you had with Plod. In the olden days it was facts on criminal actions only. Over the last decade it has become a mixture of fact, innuendo and supposition. So we have been surveilled for a while know but as it was by stealth and we just accepted it bit by bit because we never thought for a moment our government would be the enemy.</p>
<p>So basically we have several areas where are monitored and recorded. Key personal areas are;</p>
<p>Name<br />
Home<br />
Financial<br />
Health<br />
Car<br />
Travel<br />
Phone</p>
<p>I’m sure you can think of many more depending on your own interactions with the state. So as you can see a vast amount of data is already available to whoever wants to look. However, as it was in disparate databases it was not quite as encompassing as it is when all the databases are linked together where it becomes a very powerful and uncontrollable tool.   Remember all of the above categories are already recorded and maintained under penalty of law. However it should be considered that almost every one of the above categories is being expanded significantly at the moment with the intention of the state having full disclosure.</p>
<p>If you think I’m exaggerating then look what extra data will be gathered under your name with ID cards. Council snoops will be counting windows in your home for a window tax (or a view tax and some more tax anyway). All your UK financial data is already held and Gordo wants access to any offshore funds you have as well. I’d be very wary about telling your doctor you have some mental illness as you never know who will be reading it. Thinking about it your medical record could be looked at by someone like your insurance company. Mmmm. Then there is the proposal to put <a title="Automatic Number Plate Recognition " href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_number_plate_recognition " target="_blank">ANPR</a>(Automatic Number Plate Recognition) on every major road to record your car journeys.  The KGB would have loved that.   You now have to fill out forms if you are going abroad stating your foreign travel itinerary, cards used, Email addresses etc. just like the old KGB ways we laughed so much about.   Finally, your phone records are kept for trawling for several years. This will be linked with the PNC, or an upgraded DB, which already holds links of your known associates.</p>
<p>So the latest to be added, simply recording the senders and receivers of Emails, your web destinations and who you phone on the Internet is really a small step compared to all that. The Email addresses and IP phone details will complete the electronic loop for all your associates although I have heard that you are only separated by 6 people from anyone else so it must be interesting to see the software filters on that. However without the contents being recorded for any of this it can only be used for association as web pages change, Emails are deleted and IP phone calls rarely recorded. Association seems to be very important here. However, expect it to be expanded soon and the contents recorded. That would make some very interesting files to run contents searches on weekly while we do our weekly search for the guilty.</p>
<p>Soon they will have fingers in every aspect of your lives and merely by selecting a few sentences and the subjects of web sites they will be able to get anyone they want out of the way via the courts. Better than going for a walk in the woods but life ruining in another way.</p>
<p>So what can you do?</p>
<p>Well writing to your MP is out of the question. Your MP is an accomplice to your subjugation.</p>
<p>So in a couple of upcoming articles I&#8217;m going to make some suggestions about what you can do to help throw your shoes in the machines. It&#8217;s not much but will give you a bit of satisfaction. Until we get blown up or arrested of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/04/11/we-are-already-a-surveillance-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Base Instincts</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/03/16/base-instincts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/03/16/base-instincts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/03/16/base-instincts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Civilisation, the thin veneer of morality which covers all of us, is very fragile. When everything is going well it makes us follow the rules and gives us guidance on what is right or wrong. We know what is the right thing to do and so we tend to follow our morals then we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Civilisation, the thin veneer of morality which covers all of us, is very fragile. When everything is going well it makes us follow the rules and gives us guidance on what is right or wrong. We know what is the right thing to do and so we tend to follow our morals then we follow the laws although sometimes our man made laws make no sense to us.</p>
<p>But it is very thin. The slightest excuse and it is gone.</p>
<p>Being civilised is not an in built mechanism for us. We are basically animals and when the veneer cracks we will quickly return to animal ways, our base instincts will come to the fore. It is basically the fact that we have lived in a civilised society backed by laws and policed by others that we do what we know is right and the power to back those rules we don’t believe in that makes sure we do not stray from the rest. It protects the weak and ensures that we are just in our dealings. It helps that most of the rules that were put in place over decades were fair and just. We are happy to follow them. More recent rules are less so and thus we are slowly losing all respect for them. The problem with this is that once you start breaking the laws, and not suffering the punishments we think we deserve, we then consider ourselves as law breakers and the other laws, the ones we should be following, are also treated with contempt and we start breaking them as well. Once you have crossed the line then it is easier to do so again. It’s the opposite of the Health and Safety mantra. They look at each area and say we can make this safer. They are right but it comes with a big cost, both financially and on freedom. Law breaking is the same; break a little law then next time a slightly bigger law and so on. Very few jump directly to murders without passing through things like bullying, torture and killing of animals without cause.</p>
<p>If this recession bites really deep and people are put in the situation where the law conflicts with what they need to do to survive. People will adapt to the environment and fall back on their base instincts. Criminals will be running free and with no plod to stop them they will be seen as getting away with it so the choices are stay as a permanent victim, join in on the other side of the law or take the law into your own hands and pass out your own justice. All three choices will be taken by currently law abiding people as their situations chance depending on the circumstances for each of them and each will have made the right choice in their views.</p>
<p>Now there is a sliding scale for everyone on everything. All things being equal we generally conform to the law but if the circumstances are right you won’t. Would you kill a man you didn’t know in the street because he swore at you? Of course you wouldn’t. Now imagine that you were in your home and that same someone had just killed your pet and was heading towards the children. How about now? The line is different for everyone and shifts depending on circumstances.</p>
<p>Our morals are more fragile than we like to think about and are already starting to fracture.</p>
<p>Many laws we have introduced over the last few decades are not seen by all as good things. Three good examples are laws on racism, feminism and paedophilia. There are many more I could have chosen. All these introduced for a reason and all fully justifiable, even in our own minds, so we have difficulty disagreeing. We pride ourselves as having progressed where in fact we have not progressed much since we left the caves in these regards. It is all surface coating or lip service to the law.</p>
<p>Take racism. All men are seen to be equal regardless of colour. That should be true and people should be treated as if skin colour does not matter. In many cases that is the case now but it is not in our nature and those who wish to discriminate will always manage to do it. In the meantime when people are given preferential treatment the true racism is made apparent and a disgruntled citizen is created. Maybe not a racist before but certainly having a bias now. The problem nowadays is that racism is used as a reason from someone not getting something they want when many other factors are at work. Don’t get the job you wanted it was because they are racist. Never mind that there were 500 people applying for it and 100 of those were better qualified. Didn’t leave school with any qualifications. It was because the teachers were racist. Never mind the fact you were never there and had no interest in paying attention when you were. Employers want the best person for the job and it is not in their interests to discriminate. Only exception is Public Sector who mainly look at ticking equality boxes and we all complain at their performance. I would suggest that racism is worse now than it was 15 years ago and little of that is the fault of the people.</p>
<p>Feminism is similar because men and women are to be treated as equals. Again that should be true but nature conspires against us. We are not alike. We don’t even think alike, have the same mentality and the women are less risk takers. They are the ones who carry children and almost every society on Earth considers them the child rearer and the man the bread winner and this is even used in a court of law. Feminism as we know it is dying. It’s outspoken critics no better than politicians. Men have learnt quickly and are leaving the outspoken ones on the shelf. For basic sex many are turning to prostitutes and get the sex without the nagging and hand in the wallet. That is why they are trying desperately to criminalise men who ‘victimise’ prostitutes. They are starting to find they are past middle age and been left on the shelf with no marriage and no children. How can the propagate their message? It’s laughable really. They hate men but in doing so they make men hate them and pay the price in love and marriage by destroying marriage as a union. Although most of us could care less about women’s rights we will all remember the campaigns to make all men rapists and to criminalise us for political gain.</p>
<p>Finally paedophilia. Someone decided an arbitrary age and it is illegal to have sex below that. Of course it is different around the world and also difficult to tell age. The real issue is youth is seen as fertile and young people are seen as innocent. Many people and cultures prize that. The sliding scale means that even at the extreme ends, babies, some real nutters see them as sexually attractive although it’s in our nature to look for the fertile young ones. There will always be those at the extremes in anything with groups of people in. Never mind the porn just look at our newspapers. Nobody has any page 3 grannies. It’s all 18 to 20 year olds, younger if they can find a good reason and as it sells papers we all guzzle it up. We all like looking at young things. Remember Charlotte Church when she was only 13 or 14? How people commented on her body. Men like to be around young women no matter how old they are themselves. Nature made women fertile long before they matured mentally. Not man. I wonder if this was an evolutionary step because if it was the other way around the species would have died out with all the feminists saying ‘No, I have a headache’. I would envisage that when plod stops coming around one of the first things we will find returning is child brides and mistresses. It seems like it happens now more than ever despite all our laws.</p>
<p>This short list is just as examples. You can add many more I’m sure and each will have a legitimate argument that the course taken is right but we have gone too far in them all and restricted people freedoms, taken their jobs and destroyed lives in these campaign yet it will be to no avail. This has lead to many having legitimate complains against society in general. That’s you and me btw. If I criticise a black person I am racist even if that criticism is true and fair, a woman I call a feminist makes me a misogynist and sexist but she can imply I am a rapist because all men are dirty and only interested in one thing without censure and if I object to not being allowed to photograph my kids on sports day I’m a paedophile. We are all too scared to speak out about these because to come to the attention of plod or social services is not good nowadays, not that it ever was, but nowadays in our KGB style world it has a special meaning.</p>
<p>So now we are falling headlong into a recession and it is not looking good. The Government is stuck in a hole of its own making and soon it will not be able to make ends meet. People are extremely unhappy about the governments handling of the issue and even ardent Labour supporters know where to point the finger (finally) although our sliding scale works here as well and many think they are still good for the country despite the facts.</p>
<p>We just have to hope that the situation does not deteriorate too far because it can get ugly as our base instincts will start to come to the fore. They are doing so already as initially we get selfish then violent. As it gets worse more people will have to make some uncomfortable choices. Regardless of whether there are riots or not and they invoke the anti democracy laws they have rolled out there will be many places in the UK that Plod or the Army just won’t go if it gets violent. There just are not enough of them and they will just contain it and let it burn itself out. It seems like the IRA are back as well and you know how difficult it was for the Army and Plod to deal with them. When we are all at it think how long our pitifully few Military and Plod will last with no resting place. Ordinary people are disarmed and will therefore be unable to do anything about it and life will be very untenable in those areas so best start making nice to the bad guys or at the very least don’t antagonise them. You will need them for their contacts.</p>
<p>I pity, but not for long, all the little despots, usually powerless unless backed up by laws enforced by plod, who will suddenly find their victims will suddenly remember that they were the ones that blocked their planning application for an extension, that they stole equipment from the shed and reported the out of date tax disk to plod. Most people here already know where our MP lives so trying to hide will be a waste of time. Revenge is sweet and best served cold.</p>
<p>I do feel sorry for all the Pakistanis etc. who have been here 40 odd years. Have brought their kids up right, never claimed a penny from the state, kept themselves to themselves and paid their taxes as they get persecuted for all the recently arrived layabouts and wanna be terrorists. As a group they may be better armed than us but there are just not enough of them to overrun us at the moment. I bet many will leave for other countries and in some cases that will be a loss for us and a culture shock for them. Kids born here from parents born here but not seen as British. That isn’t right but what is in turbulent times.</p>
<p>The rest of it will revert, women will lose their positions and men will assert theirs. Marriage will come back on to the agenda. Children will lose their innocence and we will start the cycle again. Perhaps next time we come around equality in all ways will be part of who we are and not require legislation but it’s been unequal for thousands of years so somehow I just don’t see it ever changing.</p>
<p>Base instincts. Human nature. Not quite built into the genes but the next level up</p>
<p>Now think forward as many years as you think it will take for us to conquer the stars. Imagine our initial little outposts on far flung planets. We are talking about the Wild West type pioneers here. Going out with our wagons to hostile new environments and turning it into a home. Do you really think they will keep all the laws we have put in place today? Can you really see a mixed community with people of different races and religions? People will gravitate towards what they know and are comfortable with. Baptists will go out with other Baptists etc. They won’t want any religious upsets because it will be bad enough without them. Would you want to be part of a community with ardent feminists in? I think I’ll go out with the Baptists instead myself. It will be teams, communities and social groups that go out to make a better life for themselves and they will pick their team members with care to ensure as little friction as possible. Oh dear. It’ll be back to what we are comfortable with and with no PC box ticking of personality types to ensure we get a nice PC mix. They will be trying to make sure that they are given the best chance at succeeding.</p>
<p>Unless we can get near instantaneous travel between our colonies then they will instantly become separate communities who make their own laws, their own customs and look upon outsiders with suspicion. Then instead of the UK, USA, China etc. all doing their own thing we will have New Britain, New USA and New China on separate planets all with their own culture and laws. Many will be lawless as people spread out over planets to make their own communities.</p>
<p>I wonder how long it will take for some to declare independence and then for some to go to war. We after all will be taking our base instincts with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/03/16/base-instincts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Driving the future and not just talking about it</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/03/15/driving-the-future-and-not-just-talking-about-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/03/15/driving-the-future-and-not-just-talking-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/03/15/driving-the-future-and-not-just-talking-about-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Juan Enriquez. A Futurist. A guy who is living and driving forwards what I have just talked about as a hope.  It seems that I am one also as I believe that the progress we are making now will pay off.   A Libertarian Futurist.  Could be a new political party there.</p> <p>One of, the many, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juan Enriquez. A Futurist. A guy who is living and driving forwards what I have just talked about as a hope.  It seems that I am one also as I believe that the progress we are making now will pay off.   A Libertarian Futurist.  Could be a new political party there.</p>
<p>One of, the many, differences between him and I is that he seems not to worry about the collapse of society. I hope it is because he knows a lot more than I do and sees it as a minor hiccup in the way forward.  I agree that progress is made slowly but I am selfish and unless it is really minor even our children could miss out.  I want to be part of that future and go out into space with my own spaceship and see what is out there.</p>
<p>I found it amusing that he also talks about the universe and evolution, you know the boring stuff I was doing as background.</p>
<p>With people like him at the helm, and his <a title="Juan Enriquez Bio" href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/speakers/juan_enriquez.html" target="_blank">bio</a>, shows him in a leading role in venture capital then it explains why so much progress has been made despite what is going on in the world. I will have to keep an eye on his TED presentations.  It seems he also has interests in energy and lab grown teeth although he does believe that businesses drive innovation out of the market and that governments should intervene.  Something I&#8217;m against.</p>
<p>Watch his latest presentation here.</p>
<p><object width="446" height="326" data="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/embed/JuanEnriquez_2009-embed_high.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/JuanEnriquez-2009.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=432&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=463" /><param name="src" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/03/15/driving-the-future-and-not-just-talking-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So where are we?</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/30/so-where-are-we/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/30/so-where-are-we/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objectives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/30/so-where-are-we/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I know that you are saying &#8216;What is this guy going on about?&#8217; &#8216;Universe is 93 billion light years across. So what?&#8217; and I understand why you say so. All I am doing is putting a few base facts on the table which I will refer to later but in my mind all I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that you are saying &#8216;What is this guy going on about?&#8217; &#8216;Universe is 93 billion light years across. So what?&#8217; and I understand why you say so. All I am doing is putting a few base facts on the table which I will refer to later but in my mind all I am saying is that we are very likely not unique, the earth is not going to shrivel up and wither out no matter what we do and whatever happens to the human race is up to us.  The Universe does not care, time does not care and the odds are stacked against us.  We need to sort our own lives out and not leave anything to chance.</p>
<p>The base facts very basically being;</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>We are in a single place, the Earth, and for the foreseeable future all our resources must come from here.</li>
<li>Whilst here we must make sure we do not make it uninhabitable as we have nowhere else to go.</li>
<li>We are basically animals and forcing us to go against our nature is going to generate unintended consequences.</li>
<li>We are easily manipulated.  Usually through the money for nothing route but the fear route works just as well.</li>
<li>Men and women are wired differently.</li>
<li>Everyone has a sliding scale and it all depends on where the pointer stops.  However, we are all generally in agreement about what is best.</li>
<li>Everything we do is for short term benefit.  Sometimes by necessity but usually because of human generated events beyond our control.  No one is looking at the big picture for our species.</li>
</ul>
<p>So IMO, the main short term objectives we should be looking at are;</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Develop a food source that uses less land space to give us room to grow.</li>
<li>Develop power generation facilities that are safe and efficient.</li>
<li>Develop health care to expand our life spans and make us healthier longer.</li>
<li>Look at our transport facilities.</li>
<li>Look at our use of land space.</li>
<li>Sort out our social system.</li>
<li>Develop robots to do our menial tasks.</li>
<li>Introduce true leadership using technology and get rid of professional politicians.</li>
<li>Look at the impact on our society of changes such as fewer menial jobs.</li>
</ul>
<p>As longer term objectives we need to invest in the research for;</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Developing Faster Than Light travel and get out there.</li>
<li>Developing habitats for deep space, either our solar system or beyond.</li>
<li>Immortality.</li>
</ul>
<p>To be honest I believe we can do the initial stages for all the short term objectives now.   It&#8217;s just nobody is really investing the money.  Ironic really as in the medium term money won&#8217;t be an issue.</p>
<p>Over the next few days I&#8217;m going to look at each of these in turn and add a few more.  Then I&#8217;m going to get down at looking at what is going on now and see where we can go.  Beyond that I&#8217;m not sure.   Maybe get back to looking in disgust at what is going on and commenting on each and every one.   Where will I get the time?</p>
<p>The way I tend to look at things, both here and in my RL, is that I look at where we are now.    Define, as much as I can, where we want to end up.   Then work out a plan from moving to there.   Too many people believe that by starting again they can get Utopia but it generally causes too many problems.    Move on from where we are.  Little, clearly defined steps until we get to where we want to be and then do the same for the next stage and so on.    This is a long term project for the human species and needs to be treated as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/30/so-where-are-we/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What we are</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/29/what-we-are/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/29/what-we-are/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/29/what-we-are/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Our species is complicated.  It has evolved from another species that we share so many characteristics with it is easy to state that even after the 500 thousand years of separation that we are not that different.  Social animals with a very complicated hierarchical structure to our society.  We are omnivores with certain in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our species is complicated.  It has evolved from another species that we share so many characteristics with it is easy to state that even after the 500 thousand years of separation that we are not that different.  Social animals with a very complicated hierarchical structure to our society.  We are omnivores with certain in built functions that have evolved over hundreds of thousands of years like our fight or flight and the easy way we can simply take another life.</p>
<p>Lately of course we have evolved our mental state where we believe that we can change these in built mental functions by simple legislation.   It has lead to the slaughter of millions as our animal instructs refuse to be overcome so easy.   Of course there is the way we are working on now.  Start indoctrinating the children.   Make them all fit in the square holes we are creating for our round bodies.  Those that fail to meet this standard end up in our legal system and in jail or dead where those genes are being wiped out while genes that need to be nurtured because they are unnatural, in nature’s terms, are being deliberately kept alive whilst in the wild they could not survive.</p>
<p>Perhaps this is the way to go.  Genes that we need to be the best survivors are no longer required.   Somehow I think not.  Do we really want a planet full of people who have no ideas or passion and simply get on with whatever work is allocated to them.  Whilst we are stuck on this planet we need people who are going to stretch the boundaries, people to get in the ships and try and go faster than the speed of light.  We need a <a title="Chuck Yeager" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Yeager" target="_blank">Chuck Yeager</a> of the space age.   We need scientists who will work on the theory of warp bubbles and creating artificial wormholes so we can progress in space travel.  We also need the <a title="Albert Einstein" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein" target="_blank">Einstein’s</a> etc. working on new power generation technologies as well as people expanding the horizons on health and a million other areas.    We don’t want clones with a few bright Alphas at the helm and no progress.   In addition it is built in to us to climb trees, enquire about things, go looking for adventure and we want the chemicals generated by our bodies when we do it.  The adrenaline rush when we climb a tree or drive at ludicrous speeds is addictive.  The dopamine high we get when we play games and solve puzzles just as much so.   We just can’t change millions of years of evolution in a few years by legislation no matter how much politicians think they can.</p>
<p>Our current society was created by people who increased their knowledge, developed new technologies and advanced our species for their own personal gain. All built on previous developers and scientists.   The first ones that developed explosives to kill, then used by others to clear land and then used by others to travel in space.  All progressed from what started off as savages and each one growing in intelligence to when we were 30 years ago.   In the beginning it was power and wealth and lately just wealth.   Power being usurped by politicians who do not add anything to society at all.</p>
<p>Think over the last 100 years or so to the advances we have made.  The car, the plane, satellites, the phone, electrickery production, medicines, media, computers.    I’m sure you can think of more.   Most of these have been developed by private individuals making their way in the world.    Now look at where these were developed.   The USSR, China, the Middle East?  Don’t make me laugh.   Nope, all in good old capitalist countries where you had an idea you could make money from it.   Why bother in the Middle East when it could get you a very short haircut or in the USSR where it would be subverted for the good of the people.</p>
<p>Now look at the situation.  How many advances have we made over the last thirty years?   No private person can buy any of the ingredients you need to do any science nowadays.  No chemicals, certain equipment is banned and you can expect a visit from plod if you try to get any.   Too dangerous for us but OK for anyone up to 30 years ago.   Even the government thinks we are too thick yet if you are a corporation you can have it all.    Of course this way once they start they don’t have any real competition to develop so it comes out as a basic model and then slowly develops.  We want most of our development in leaps and bound not namby pamby baby steps and drip fed for maximum profit.    Of course when baby steps are required we should take care but those are few and far between.</p>
<p>As well as the rules and regulation that have strangled our innovation and progress we are also faced with the situation when our governments now control the way our companies progress.    All over the free world our socialist governments now own controlling interest in the banks and other key corporates even if those interests are less than 50%.  You take governments money you are beholden to it.    We can be sure that with the government feeding money into car manufacturers then gone are the days of the muscle car no matter what the demand as tighter emissions and control and monitoring systems are introduced and model development stagnates.   Lack of competition and all doing the same lead to that.    However it is with the banks that our government will get the biggest bang for its buck.   A corporate after a loan.  ‘What’s your policy on hiring minorities and what is the percentage of minorities in your workplace?’ will become relevant questions on if a successful corporate gets a loan or not.   Private individuals will be asked for an id card and what they are doing for global warming whilst the reason for the loan will be checked for where it fits in with helpful guidelines on environment policy and its creation of CO2.   Say goodbye to goods that don’t fit our government view as they won’t be banned per se but you will not be able to get a loan to make them or a loan to buy one even if someone makes one with their own money and why would anyone risk their own money on something nowadays.  Much better sticking to making a small but steady profit in something that gives steady income for little risk at the moment.  The alternative is to set up a company with a mandatory partner who invests no money.  Takes 40% of the take and sets all the rules you have to follow.  Out of your portion of the funding of course.   No wonder small companies are disappearing at the moment and we are not innovating any more.  It&#8217;s all about getting the most our of previous innovators.  Tweaks to existing products but nothing new.</p>
<p>We are now at the stage where the only development going on is development for our government funded by the government for its ends.    Usually on new systems to monitor and oppress it’s subjects.   Stalin would be proud that his children have become so successful that nowhere in the world is there anywhere to be truly free today.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m personally convinced that the IQ of our society is going down.   We are receiving poor education, indocrinated and emasculated to fit an ideal which in the short term will stall human progress.</p>
<p>To end on a positive note.    Socialist societies cannot survive long term.  They can be created and they can destroy millions of lives.   This time it will be billions I am sure but inevitably they will fall.   Our species does not support them and people rebel.  Usually not openly but eventually it builds until they do.  The first die by being pitted against a highly trained army or police force but then more and more join then the few traitors who stand against their own people cannot stand against the masses.    Why do you think it takes 20 plod to take down one drug dealer, one suspected terrorist.  They need overwhelming force to frighten the rest of us.    That is one advantage the American people have over us.  Their second amendment means there are millions of guns out there but even there as New Orleansshows they don’t need to be prised from cold dead hands when plod comes to collect them but if they ever rose up en masse.  Governments would fall.    Pity we don&#8217;t have such a law.</p>
<p>Anyway, we are still a social species, people get on with each other and we happily barter and trade make friends and progress on our merry way through life.  Nothing much interferes with our wish to live our lives and leave others to live theirs.    That is where the politicians get involved of course.   And screw it up for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/29/what-we-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where we fit in the Cosmos</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/28/where-we-fit-in-the-cosmos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/28/where-we-fit-in-the-cosmos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Background]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/28/where-we-fit-in-the-cosmos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I just want to point out something that we need to put on the table as a hurdle in our progress and by hurdle I mean a doozie.   It is where we fit in the cosmos and the hurdles we must overcome for our species survival in my opinion.</p> <p>Just to show where we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to point out something that we need to put on the table as a hurdle in our progress and by hurdle I mean a doozie.   It is where we fit in the cosmos and the hurdles we must overcome for our species survival in my opinion.</p>
<p>Just to show where we fit in the universe.   We can start with our earth.  It is approximately 8 thousand miles in diameter.   To put this in perspective we can look at this article where the earth is represented by a peppercorn.   Read <a title="Earth as a Peppercorn" href="http://www.noao.edu/education/work/Peppercorn/Peppercorn_Main.html" target="_blank">here</a>.   (It will open in a popup which you can close to return here)</p>
<p>I won’t copy it but you must read the article in full to get an idea of the scale of the solar system and the issues we have.  The rest of the this article refers to data from that article.</p>
<p>Now we have done that at the scale we are working on for the Earth at a peppercorn the nearest star to our sun is Proxima Centauri at 4.2 such light-years and would be 4000 miles away at that scale.   Our nearest star.   4000 real miles at that scale. Unbelievable distances.   This is just our local part of our own galaxy, our back garden so to speak.  Then we have our street, the Orion Arm (5000 light years and contains 600 million stars) followed by our town, The Milky Way Galaxy.   The Milky Way itself is 50 thousand light years across and contains 200 billion stars.  It is just one galaxy of so many we can&#8217;t count them.</p>
<p>In our *cough* local group, within approx 5 million light years we have two additional galaxies, Andromeda and Triangulum. And as we move out this expands until we see that the visible universe is 14 billion light years across.   It contains 350 billion large galaxies, 7 trillion dwarf galaxies and those have 30 billion trillion (3&#215;10²²) stars.     Read more <a title="An Atlas of our Universe" href="http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/" target="_blank">here</a> if you are interested.    The size of the whole universe is estimated at 93 billion light years across and is growing all the time.  It too is evolving, changing as new galaxies are created and old ones destroyed, stars created long before our sun have died and collapsed and black holes are swallowing up anything they touch.  It’s all happening so slow and so far away that to us looking out nothing is happening.</p>
<p>The sheer size of the place and where we fit in makes you wonder about what is out there that our puny minds can&#8217;t even imagine.</p>
<p>Not sure exactly where this part fits in with a deity.   Maybe the cosmos is just decoration on the wall where the deity keeps its Petri dish and it&#8217;s just an illusion or it could very well be that the deity is just so busy with more interesting species.  93 billion light years is a bit of a trek.</p>
<p>So here we are.    Pure mathematics says that we are not alone in the universe.   It is unlikely in the extreme that we are unique and thus we are insignificant, our petty squabbles, even if we were to destroy ourselves and this world it means nothing to the cosmos.   If life evolved here in a trillion to one chance then life can evolve somewhere else where there is 30 billion such chances in the visible universe alone.   Whether we would ever meet anyone is an entirely different thing.  We don’t seem to be on a local bus route but we may be within reach of some redneck backwater if all the UFO spotters are right.</p>
<p>Currently we are stuck on this planet.  Everything needs room to grow and the earth cannot contain our biological need to grow and live.    We need to find a way to do that.   Sci-Fi points us to several options that science has identified but so far we have made no move along that path since the US travelled to the moon in the 1960s and 1970s although there is talk about sending someone to Mars.    It’s still a small step as we can see from above in our scale model it’s 2.4 inches from the earth to the moon, and 14 yards from the earth to Mars while it is 4000 miles to the nearest star.    However, although it is a small step it is a significant one.  Every journey starts with a single step.   We need more steps and more people working on making those steps longer and with less time between them.</p>
<p>In my opinion this is the single most important long term project that we have as a species and yet we are doing virtually nothing in this field.  Everything is handled short term and thus we don’t really look at going into space beyond our solar system while we know for certain that one planet exists there that supports life and we are already on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/01/28/where-we-fit-in-the-cosmos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

