Posts this Month

January 2010
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Archived Posts

Categories

The power of innovation

Is this how they intend to change us from gas guzzling power hungry drivers to more eco friendly drivers?

Our heroes are Formula 1 drivers, Nascar drvers, Rally drivers etc. All adrenaline pumping fast and furious 0-100 in 2.something seconds and top speeds around 200+mph just like we have grown accustomed to.

Now it appears that the rules behind F1 are changing. The main one being no more pit stops. This means they have to carry their fuel load from the go and they will need to have vehicles which can handle that. That’ll mean they will be slower and sturdier. But will still be heavier on that later laps when the fuel is almost gone.

Nowin the past it speed went up, corners taken faster and performance and handling improved. Now it will change with the emphasis being on getting the most bang out of the fuel. The car that needs the least fuel at the start will be lighter, faster and more controllable while the others are more cumbersome. Get a good start and then cruise rather than race.

The innovation will be diected towards making the consumption less and thus the emphasis will be different.

Looks like the F1 committee has been infiltrated by Greens. I wonder though what it will do to the sport, will it be just as good as before or will it become boring as cars try and squeeze the last drop of juice out of the car. If it turns boring then the manufacturers and advertisers will pull out and we will all turn to the US for the latest Nascar races. At least the Americans know how to live. (Until Obama turns his eyes, from the teleprompter, on to dirty, noise racing cars anyway)

I can see it now. Accelerates from 0-60 in 15.2sec just like a F1 car. Whoo Hoo. I can hardly wait.

Rules, they screw the fun out of everything.

I need to win the Lottery

Or to go into drug, wimmin or gun smuggling. I would love one of these submarines. Don’t know why they call it a plane though. Richard Branson hopes one day to vist 35,000 ft down. Well he may very well but his chances of being alive when he gets there are less than the chances of a Labour Politician telling the truth.

Must be much safer than a real plane though. I would guess there would be much more interesting things to see as well and if you wanted to bring back something special well who would know? I wonder if this would get from France to the UK with a full load.

Flying through the sea without a care in the world and then one day…. a flashing set of blue lights appears.

This or the Aston? Decisions, decisions…. I think I’d have this…

3D TV on the way

It seems that the TV providers have given up on waiting for a decent 3D system to arrive. Sky are rolling out some 3D channels and are starting with nine pubs this weekend showing a 3D football match. Expanding across pubs during April followed by homes later in the year.

I envisage that there will not be too much spending on infrastructure so it’s a good step to take for them. Even if it doesn’t work then they won’t have lost much. Personally, I hate these 3D systems but can’t see any alternative on the horizon.

It will be interesting to see what happens.

Coming to a street near you

An Anti-Sniper system similar to this SENTRI surveillance system was discussed a few years ago during the Bosnia conflict. It seems sniping was a national pastime and no one, and I mean no one was safe. The version I read about though did more than take a photograph, it fired .50 cal rounds at the sniper making this easy game a bit more dangerous. How that more challenging version was received I don’t know.

Now it appears it is being rolled out in the big cities in America. Sadly, without the .50 cal. I wonder why? Like the UK, I though these places had gun control programmes. Funny how they don’t seem to work wherever they are implemented.

Looking at all this security stuff makes it look like the place to be in. The money for terrorists, bad guys and just plain security seems to be growing every year. I think I need to reconsider my plans.

Replicating Rapid Prototyper

Self Replicating Machines. Sounds like something from the future but some have been with us for a while.

The latest, an Open Source version, is the RepRap. I think I will build one when I get some spare pennies.

Although it is a long way away from a Star Trek type replicator I’m sure it would be useful in any mad scientists workshop and significantly cheaper than the others I’ve seen so far. I wonder what some bright spark will make with it? Need to keep my eye on the Open Source builds.

Now if only it could make ammunition. :)

Targeting the motorist

Even Cameron is in support of picking on the easy targets; the motorist but I think this trial takes things a step too far and brings a new meaning to the words ‘targeting the motorist’.

How long realistically before we see missiles attached to these systems. For Anti-Terror operations only of course.

Have a voice.

Now it may only be a voice in someones ear who can speak to the government but here is a poll by a government IT tradeorganisation for suppliers on IT policy for broadband infrastructure.

Intellect

Have a visit. Make a choice. I made mine and know it will be ignored. Maybe in the future it will be different.

Funding issues

EADS Astrium is again looking at the idea of collecting solar power from space. H/T Ivan. Power that will be significantly cheaper than any solar power collected on Earth. Personally, bar fusion or one of the newer technologies, I think it is the best way forward and we should be doing it anyway.

The hiccup seems to be that they are looking at having the Project funded by government. Clearly the see it not being profitable but as a test platform and they don’t want to *cough* ‘invest’ that money when they will not be able to recoup it. The way to make it viable is to have a space elevator or magnetic rails to throw the kit into space. A win win. Two technologies from one project instead of the Windmill project, no technology from a fortune invested. Even David Cameron returned his because it was obsolete and he believes in them. A brief moment of sanity. It’ll be unlikely to happen again.

Then all of a sudden they said ‘The tricky bit is the power-beaming technology… in the event of a beam wandering off the receiving station could be a bit messy – indistinguishable from orbital raygun bombardment.’

I think funding could come any day from the US DOD. It’ll be peanuts to them.

Personally, I think it would be safer than a ground based nuclear station. You could turn off the beam or point it elsewhere and it certainly won’t be subject to a group of muslim or green nutters fiddling with it with Semtex vests. Plus, it’s not like we will put the receiving station in London or somewhere. No it will be safely in Baghdada desert somewhere.

Handy tool

There have been times when I’ve wanted to download YouTube videos for later off line use and been unable too. So eventually I found a tool that enabled the download but it required installation on your system.

Today I found an online one that works fine.

The Tube Grabber

Build your collection of videos without worrying if they will be there when you want to watch them. Don’t forget to share.

The UN of Science

There is a proposal going around to create a UN type body looking after Science. Read here.

Like the UN itself it sounds a good idea on paper. An independent global body to prioritise research and scientific endeavour to improve the human race.

Sadly, it shows its true potential in the very first sentence.

As the disappointment of the Copenhagen climate summit sinks in

Like the UN itself it is clearly not going to be any use at all. It will be full of self serving bureaucrats who are just looking after their own agendas and promoting a liberal whingy whiney agenda.

Another one. When will it end?