<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology will save us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/09/27/technology-will-save-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/09/27/technology-will-save-us/</link>
	<description>Looking to the future for our species and showing how Technology will save us if Politics doesn't doom us first</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 11:04:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord T</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/09/27/technology-will-save-us/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/09/27/technology-will-save-us/#comment-871</guid>
		<description>James,

I don&#039;t forget those that follow the doomsayers.  The blog tagline is &#039;if Politics doesn&#039;t doom us first&#039;    I think that factors it in.

Now the guy who wrote that article pointed me to another article I liked which said

“In twenty years, [renewable] sources will have failed economically, leaving renewable energy to be remembered as the energy equivalent of sub-prime mortgages. “</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t forget those that follow the doomsayers.  The blog tagline is &#8216;if Politics doesn&#8217;t doom us first&#8217;    I think that factors it in.</p>
<p>Now the guy who wrote that article pointed me to another article I liked which said</p>
<p>“In twenty years, [renewable] sources will have failed economically, leaving renewable energy to be remembered as the energy equivalent of sub-prime mortgages. “</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameshigham</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/09/27/technology-will-save-us/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>jameshigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/09/27/technology-will-save-us/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>&quot;Her point that ...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Her point that &#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameshigham</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/09/27/technology-will-save-us/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>jameshigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-liberi.com/2009/09/27/technology-will-save-us/#comment-868</guid>
		<description>Alison George makes some good points and if taken in isolation, in a perfect test tube world, are valid.  He point that there is an adaptability, a networking solution which can overcome vicissitudes and adapt to the new challenges is a good one.

Don&#039;t get me wrong - I vastly prefer your optimistic [you&#039;d call it realistic] belief that technology can win through and there is a lot of evidence to support it.  Many times the doomsayers predicted the end and it did not come.

Two things in the equation which can&#039;t be ignored though are the agenda of people who wish the doomsayers to be right for the profits to be made from it and some bizarre sense of global destiny - they need to be factored into Alison&#039;s argument too.

The other is the metaphysical and I smile to see &quot;rationalist&quot; reactions whenever I introduce that.  It ranges form dismissal to apoplexy and yet there are observable phenomena which need to be factored in, not least in the biological adaptability Alison refers to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alison George makes some good points and if taken in isolation, in a perfect test tube world, are valid.  He point that there is an adaptability, a networking solution which can overcome vicissitudes and adapt to the new challenges is a good one.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I vastly prefer your optimistic [you'd call it realistic] belief that technology can win through and there is a lot of evidence to support it.  Many times the doomsayers predicted the end and it did not come.</p>
<p>Two things in the equation which can&#8217;t be ignored though are the agenda of people who wish the doomsayers to be right for the profits to be made from it and some bizarre sense of global destiny &#8211; they need to be factored into Alison&#8217;s argument too.</p>
<p>The other is the metaphysical and I smile to see &#8220;rationalist&#8221; reactions whenever I introduce that.  It ranges form dismissal to apoplexy and yet there are observable phenomena which need to be factored in, not least in the biological adaptability Alison refers to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

