Reading this article about the Human Ape and why we are the only species to shed its body hair made me think.
Darwins theory, which I believe in, doesn’t really explain why we are the only creature to lose our fur. Therefore it casts doubt on Darwins theory is the conclusion. Mmmmm.
Well the problem with theories is that they are not always perfect. Vital components, yet to be thought about or discovered, are missing and thus cast doubt on the whole theory. Plus many, many factors take place which on the surface may not appear to have an impact on the theory but could explain it if only it was factored into the equation.
One example given in the article is that humans lost their hair due to natural selection. Men chose women with lower body hair to mate with and thus took us down this path. The argument against goes that ‘it is hard to believe one species should chose balder females’. ‘Hard to believe’ when we see so many amazing and unbelievable things in nature. That sounds controversial and certainly not a scientists way of talking. Now remember that we have an inbuilt preference for younger females, younger means more fertile and fitter in general, could this date from that time where we made decisions that the young, and the young of many creatures are hairless, were what we wanted and this bias led to us being hairless? Coupled with the Atlanteans driving SUVs and the fact we were able to use fur as coats could have led to hair being less of an issue and hairless individuals adapted quickly to the new requirement to get clothed and the hairy ones, probably feminists, refused to adapt drove the males away and died out as there was no PC industry around then to save them.
I don’t really know tbh but one thing I am aware of is that there are holes in many theories that do not get ripped apart as much as Darwins work. It is clearly an attack on science when science itself attacks all these theories in its attempt to get at the truth. Some attacks don’t seem to be interested in getting at the truth and we can see from what is taking place around the world with Creationism that Science is under direct attack. Its either religion, of all sorts, or greenies or anti people people or even more all trying to get science and technology stopped or banned and we all get back to as it was 1000 years ago where we eked out a subsistence existance. It will be reading and writing next to stop all progress and our government seems to have that well in hand at the moment with our dismal education system.
Its just a theory though.
The problem with theories
Reading this article about the Human Ape and why we are the only species to shed its body hair made me think.
Darwins theory, which I believe in, doesn’t really explain why we are the only creature to lose our fur. Therefore it casts doubt on Darwins theory is the conclusion. Mmmmm.
Well the problem with theories is that they are not always perfect. Vital components, yet to be thought about or discovered, are missing and thus cast doubt on the whole theory. Plus many, many factors take place which on the surface may not appear to have an impact on the theory but could explain it if only it was factored into the equation.
One example given in the article is that humans lost their hair due to natural selection. Men chose women with lower body hair to mate with and thus took us down this path. The argument against goes that ‘it is hard to believe one species should chose balder females’. ‘Hard to believe’ when we see so many amazing and unbelievable things in nature. That sounds controversial and certainly not a scientists way of talking. Now remember that we have an inbuilt preference for younger females, younger means more fertile and fitter in general, could this date from that time where we made decisions that the young, and the young of many creatures are hairless, were what we wanted and this bias led to us being hairless? Coupled with the Atlanteans driving SUVs and the fact we were able to use fur as coats could have led to hair being less of an issue and hairless individuals adapted quickly to the new requirement to get clothed and the hairy ones, probably feminists, refused to adapt drove the males away and died out as there was no PC industry around then to save them.
I don’t really know tbh but one thing I am aware of is that there are holes in many theories that do not get ripped apart as much as Darwins work. It is clearly an attack on science when science itself attacks all these theories in its attempt to get at the truth. Some attacks don’t seem to be interested in getting at the truth and we can see from what is taking place around the world with Creationism that Science is under direct attack. Its either religion, of all sorts, or greenies or anti people people or even more all trying to get science and technology stopped or banned and we all get back to as it was 1000 years ago where we eked out a subsistence existance. It will be reading and writing next to stop all progress and our government seems to have that well in hand at the moment with our dismal education system.
Its just a theory though.