Posts this Month

Archived Posts

Categories

Yes. I am a bigot in todays society

I’ve just been discussing the fact that I have been called a bigot. It must have been something on my blog or in a comment I’ve left at another site that triggered it. I was a bit surprised at first because I didn’t think I was but there you go. You learn something about yourself every day.

Thinking about it I clearly have a dislike of people in the category of gays, muslims, social class, coloureds and females.

To be fair though, I don’t actually have a problem with all of them but my source of bigotry appears to be that I don’t support their lifestyle choices. I am not Politically Correct and in this society that makes me bad and a bigot.

In reality I don’t have a problem with gays, muslims, lower classes, coloureds or females at all. In fact females are my favourite humans and many of them are coloured and/or social class and/or muslims and/or gay and I don’t have an issue with any of them. Even those who wouldn’t touch me with a bargepole or are just not my type. I’ve been around them all a long time and don’t have an issue with any them. It’s only lately that my clear bigotry has been made plain because I don’t support their choices and agree with them. It’s the outspoken ones or the radicals. The radical gays, the muslim extremists and the feminists (All feminists appear to be radicals). I dislike them all. The lower classes and coloured are slightly different which I will get on to.

I do support their right to do as they want but my personal views are mine and I don’t actually agree with everything that legally goes on in this country and thus I find myself being UnPC and clearly a bigot.

To take each in turn;

- Gays. I’ve known gays for a while now and all have been open about it but didn’t push it in my face. It’s not a lifestyle that I am interested in. Sorry. I don’t think they should be allowed to marry because that is defined as between a man or a woman but I do think that gay relationships should be recognised in law outside of marriage. If the law wants to make a recognised legal partnership such as gay partnerships then it can and put all the rights of marriage into that and that would be fine. However, I’m not that bothered if the church redefined itself to include gays. That’s up to it.
The main issue for me is allowing children to be adopted by gay couples. When it is recognised that family life is falling apart and causing issues for the children that will last for decades we put them in an unnatural environment to be brought up. I say unnatural because we all know that nature doesn’t allow gay couples to procreate without some outside interference.
But of course the gays want legitimacy in the public’s eyes, not just acceptance and that means preferential treatment. They want proper marriages, special protection and special treatment and that is causing issues.

- Muslims. To be honest I’ve only known a few muslims in my life. They have kept themselves to themselves. Been good people and friendly enough. Their kids are better behaved than ours in general and their family society tends to be solid and I think that is what makes their kids more stable. There are a few radicals but, like christians, they are not all like that.
Lately however the muslims that seem to be coming to our country are of a different type. They seem more radical to begin with. I suspect that if we didn’t give into them at every turn there would be a lot more extremists out there. They are pushing for concessions all the time and we are giving in. They don’t need the extremists as they are winning anyway and being given what they want without a fight at all. Again, they want their laws, their marriages, special protection and special treatment and that is causing issues as well.   They should integrate here or stay at home if they like it so much.
I hope I am wrong but I see this as the biggest issue we are facing over the next 20 years. I don’t want my daughters brought up under Sharia law. The biggest losers and the ones I feel sorry for will be the muslims that came here from the 60s on, integrated well and have been good citizens. How can we identify these from the more modern radicals when it counts?

- Social classes and coloureds. Frankly, I have always been confused about coloured people in the UK. The many born and educated here who seem to make up the bottom of our society. I’ve known a few coloured people and, if you ignored the colour of their skin, you couldn’t tell the difference between us. Same hopes, fears and lifestyles. I’ve since discovered, via Snuffys site, that it seems to be a definite policy of relying on the victim card for some to make their living.  This is the same principle as the social class and how they are always poor.  To do this of course requires victims and thus policies put in place actually lead to this placing in society. It tells coloureds and those who are poor that they cannot better themselves because of the evil people keeping them down.   It can only happen when we allow these people to play the victim card and it makes a difference. We need to get them young, make a difference and change this entire culture. It has been done, it can be done and it should be done. Only then will we have true equality between UK citizens. Sadly at this stage it will mean writing off a large chunk of people to make the point but it will be best for the future. (And in case you are unsure part of that large chunk are white) Again being the victim means they are entitled to special protection and special treatment. This again causes issues among our people. This is a big issue make no mistake. Hard choices will need to be made which is why no choices are made at all by our gutless and spineless politicians.  I’m fed up of seeing scum getting away with murder because of their upbringing whilst people like me get years for defending our property.

- Females. I’m talking about the hardest feminists here. Not to be confused with strong and independent women. Feminists believe that man should be subjugated and inferior because women bear the children and don’t think with their fists. They can quote all the ways men mistreat women and their favourite feminist authors but get stuck when actually looking outside their chosen subject. I’ve read that women are getting unhappier because they can’t balance a career and kids which is unfortunate as most men don’t actually want kids because they are cute and they can’t stand the competition and so they are not going to help those women that want them. They want masculine men but need them to be emasculated once they have them. It just doesn’t work like that. You make your choice. Personally, I see feminism dying out. You can’t legislate men to be masculine but emasculated and marry feminists. It seems to me that women are already equal in all the ways that matter. It’s their own perceptions and unrealistic wants that make them still feel they have some way to go. Women are better than men in so many ways and men are better than women in others. It depends what you want to do. It’s a balance that we just need to work out. Women pick dogs as pets because the dogs love them unconditionally and listen intently to what they say, men don’t. Men pick dogs as pets because the dogs do what their told and shut up when they want them to. Two different requirements for, it seems, two different species. I’ve already told my son about feminists and the trap they lay so that should be one less pacified male. Fingers crossed. As part of his training he pulls the wings off flies to toughen him up.

In my view nobody should get special treatment or special protection. We are all equal and the law should decide guilt or innocence based on facts that exclude race, colour or special circumstances and punishment should also be consistent.

You see I do believe in the past you have all been badly treated. Everybody has. I think that we should all be equal and we should work to correct this as a matter of course but what we do here is not equality it just swings the pendulum the other way so we still have inequality but it’s the other side, the minority, that now has superiority. This causes dissent and among a much higher number of people. The analogy I like to look at it as is a traffic scenario. The speed limit on this particular road is 70mph. Our council ‘experts’ say it should be 50mph to make it right. (Let’s ignore the methods these clowns use to decide 50 just for this analogy). So they lower the speed limit to 50mph. They don’t lower it to 30mph because of all the years it was wrong they just fix it to what is right.

And if it fixes a wrong then only the true bigots are upset with the change. To swing the pendulum the other way makes more of us upset and makes us bigots too. More likely to listen to the radicals. So let’s just fix the wrongs and make the pendulum point straight down. That way we can all live happily together and the true bigots will have no ammunition to use against their pet projects.

Until that day comes the number of bigots like me in this country will continue to rise as people see undeserving people get special treatment until one day people that are real bigots will tip the scale and the people will snap with the pendulum swinging wildly the other way and Yes, you will get special treatment but not what you want.

It can be fixed.  It should be fixed and we just need to be sensible how we do it.  Which probably means politicians should not get involved.