Posts this Month

Archived Posts

Categories

The benefits for any green costs

Just to expand on my reply to James comment about the cost benefits converting CO2 to Methanol.

In private business every project has a cost/benefit analysis done to enable the business to get the best value for their spend.  This usually involves all options being considered and the best one, in that businesses view, is chosen and implemented.

In government of course the criteria is different and thus it will not be the best value for money that is chosen but the one that gives whatever criteria is chosen by the selectors.   Thus it may be the one where a minister is on the board for example rather than one that is much cheaper.   (Just an example)

In costing your projects in the green area though the cost/benefits are treated pretty much as a direct cost and the benefits are it enables the project to go ahead and shuts the whingey whiney greenies up.   Excellent benefits on their own btw.

So all that is done is the cost is added to the total costs and then evaluated to see if there is profit to be made.  If so it’s a go, if not then it’s halted.

Now the government always knows what is best.  Even better than people in the line of business it fiddles with.   Because as previously stated their criteria is to cost effectively reduce emissions, for example, whilst the governments is to make sure that the correct mix of foreigners, women and gay people are employed.   (The government has many agendas)

Now if the government didn’t specify what green add ons it wanted but specified a few attainable criteria on emissions instead then business would chose the cheapest and the best and emissions would come down.     I’m sure it wouldn’t be what the government chooses though.

A new sexual wonder-drug

Isn’t science wonderful.

After the success of Viagra which has on it’s own probably pleased more people than we could possibly imagine we have this new enhanced version of NanoViagra to keep us up all night and going strong.

They say it can also treat premature ejaculation.      How can that be?  No such illness exists.   You ejaculate when you are ready.    OK some are ready before others but it’s still not premature.    What we really need is something to make the women get there quicker.

Now there would be a drug that would outsell everything on the market.  A sexual wonder-drug that would replace Aspirin as the number one drug for headaches the world over.

Converting CO2 to Methanol

Now isn’t this process a better idea.  Instead of just burying the CO2, and spawning a new industry, this process converts CO2 into a clean burning fuel that can be used in BioFuels.

Much better although I do wonder about how much power, and therefore CO2 generated, the process requires.

It will be interesting to watch because it sounds to me like we have a system that generates power from fossil fuels and some CO2 and then another system that converts the CO2 to Methanol so that it can be fed into the system at the start of the cycle again.

Perhaps these converters should be actually built on the power stations and feed the Methanol straight in.  Makes more sense that the CCS technology being mandated.

Why we are all Socialists at heart

We have all heard the phrase ‘If you are young and not a Socialist you have no heart and if you are old and not a Conservative you have no brains’.

My take on that is that you are young and have no money you want some and feel others in your situation deserve some as well from all those that have plenty. That’s the Socialist way. Then as you have worked your way through life to scrimp and save and bring up a family you want to keep that which you have sweated and worked so hard for.

If that was true then our love for socialism would be short because there are a lot more older people than younger people and that ratio is increasing. So why does Socialism get so many supporters every generation or so?

Well, I think that it our nature to be caring to others. Now before you laugh think about it. We are selfish creatures. We have needs and wants.

Examples of needs are food, shelter and protection. Examples of wants are to have friends, procreate and have nice toys. Both basic lists and everyone will have different views on what should be in there.

So when our needs are not being met we hold on tightly to what we have, sharing with no one and charity is out of the question. Once our needs are met and we feel comfortable that it will continue to do so then we are willing to share some things with others close to us and spend money on status stuff like toys and presents for the other sex. Then once we feel comfortable that our needs and wants are met we give more to others including charity and want to help others less fortunate. Our caring side is freed by because we no longer need to be totally selfish and we do like to help people where we can.

This is why we had wealthy landowners in the past providing poorhouses, medical care and schools. We have people now who provide law and medical care free of charge to poor people outside the legislation that requires it. Sometimes barely making a living themselves, in comparison to others of their skill sets. Bill Gates as his ilk providing aid to Africa all with their own money. Unlike our government which, provides aid to Africa etc. with borrowed money. Who in their right mind borrows money to give away whilst your own people, those you are supposed to be working for, are left with the ever increasing bills and to rub salt in the wounds the people that need the aid where we send it don’t get it either as it’s largely swallowed up by middlemen.

So we elect a Socialist government because they say they will create Social Justice and that is where it goes wrong because there is no such thing as Social Justice. It just creates injustice because we all have different requirement on what we consider to be enough for our needs and sliding scales on what we consider to be enough for our wants. Some think if your needs are met then you should help others, others who may have few needs think that our needs are being selfish and we should settle for less. Some of us have bigger, more expensive houses, others have more kids, others have expensive hobbies and so the amount we want to share differs. That isn’t good enough for those who feel strongly enough about what they call social justice and they raise and support champions who are willing to take via force from the others what they do not want to give willingly. They don’t see that it will impact them as, after all, they are not rich or even well off, and anyway it’s just a bit more. Thus Socialists rise to power to force people to do what they did freely before and because they are inefficient they destroy the economy in the process of making their ideal world and turn those that gave into people fighting to hold on to everything as they no longer can meet their needs and wants and need to keep what they have just to meet their own requirements. Real charity for others drops. It takes a while but it always happens. Then their support goes and we are back at the beginning again. Economy in bad shape. People sticking in local communities and having no interest in anyone else no matter how badly off they are. Socialism proved, yet again, that it doesn’t work and people wondering why we even thought it would.

So in quite a few years when the debts are paid and we have amassed some more wealth we will do the exactly the same thing again and they will again lead the country into the same situation.

Empty heads vote Socialists in and empty pockets vote them out.

The only real cure is education. The Socialists know that and that’s why they fill the schools with so many socialist drones and ensure that they are poorly educated. Sure kids leave with good grades but today 5 grade ‘A’s will get you a job flipping burgers from a street stand and anything less means you can’t read or write. It’s ‘A*’s that count now, anything less means they are indoctrinated into obeying the authority of that state and will put up with anything it does to them.

We must change it. We need to teach the basics. Maths, English, Basic Economics (at the very least it will help them manage their finances) and Basic Logical Thinking. How to work things out from facts and take less on faith. Question what is said and does it make sense. Too often even the brightest among us takes a lot on faith. I’ve done it myself.

Although it may not help though. The need to help others can override logic. Although one day we will have enough wealth to cover all our social programmes. I think we were almost there if we changed the way we looked at certain things.  By looking at each issue differently and using logic we could make them manageable. Maybe next time we have some spare pennies.

Or if we develop our FTL capability we could we off on our ‘Wagontrain to the skies’ where we will probably do the same things there once we reach that point in society.

Human nature is just too strong to overcome with legislation and/or logic.

Avoid the lure of shiny if you can

I tell people that are casual acquaintances or I am introduced to that I am an accountant because if I tell them I work with computers everyone thinks you can debug their issue with their XBox 360 connection via broadband or some other obscure issue and are not reticent at coming and asking. For some reason nobody seems to want to tell you their financial situation and ask your views on how they are doing.

However, a lot of people do know what I do for a living and I often get asked by people to help them with their issues. Some I can help and some I can’t. The one that is most common though is ‘What is the best computer to buy?’ They have for some reason decided to enter the digital age or have had a computer before but think it’s about time for a new one.

My first retort to this is ‘What do you want to use it for?’ That usually stops them in their tracks. They usually throw out a few uses such as letters, browsing the internet and maybe games. That makes me ask ‘What sort of games?’ If it’s Freecell or Solitaire then we don’t have any issues but if it’s the latest FPS or strategy game with an online component we have an issue. If you already have a computer that browses the internet, has a word processor and has these games then there is actually no reason to update to the latest version because you are going to get little benefit from it. Sure it will be faster, look nicer and have the latest add ons but it will cost you about 1K on average and the bloatware you will be adding by upgrading to Vista and Office 2007 will bring the speed right back down. Best add a new HDA (Hard Disk) and extra memory to your existing system. A very cost effective upgrade. But never upgrade the OS. If you do that you really should be buying a new system completely.

However, if you want the latest games then be prepared to pay for a good solid piece of kit. Lots of memory, large HDA and large screen. Of course you won’t be able to transfer the applications you’ve bought, you will need to upgrade even though you won’t actually use more than one or two of the hundreds of new ‘features’.

Most home users who buy new actually don’t need the latest kit though and should actually consider buying a second hand one or one of the lower spec new models. At this time that is fraught with issues as even the lower spec new ones don’t come with XP any more. It’s all Vista. Of course buying second hand has its own issues for entry into the digital age unless you have a very good friend in computers or it’s a family member or close friend upgrading that has the spare system that they would ordinarily be throwing away. You could buy Apple but they are still really expensive but worth considering if you have the money as there are several benefits and Linux is still too complex for uninitiated users.

It wasn’t that long ago that computers were not considered so readily for disposal but with the big corporations rapid upgrade path, Microsoft’s software upgrade policy and legislation on second hand kit it’s more common to just throw away the old one now than to attempt to reuse it. Doing someone else a favour can come back and haunt you if you make even a simple mistake.

Personally I am interested in one of these cheap computers intended for third world countries with a wind up power supply. That coupled with several DVDs of PDFs and web snapshots stored correctly would be of use in a survival situation when ordinary PCs would be useless. Not seen any for sale anywhere.

Of course, it’s not just computers that are shiny. New DVD recorders, Plasma TVs and other electronic kit. Although they don’t have the same software issues as PCs just consider if you really need the new bit of kit in the current economic climate.

Bear in mind I’m not saying don’t upgrade. I’m saying don’t upgrade to keep the corporations profits up. Let them innovate and give us something worth the money before you part with your hard earned cash.

On the positive side if you are considering upgrading then you clearly are one of the better off and the computer industry will be grateful for your contribution. Things are getting a bit tight out there. Maybe Microsoft should consider giving us something useful.

Defining the interfaces

One of the things that has always irritated me with new technology is that two competing companies tweak the internals of the equipment with no regard to the impact it will have on the consumer. Their view is that it should ‘salt the earth’ so if their product does not become dominant then it becomes useless. They then go for more deals out there by discounting in an attempt to gain market dominance. Good for firms but bad for the consumer. Because of this, and other, reasons I don’t like to be at the bleeding edge of technology and wait until there is a clear leader unless its lifetime makes that moot.

That’s why when I read this article on an agreement being reached for electric cars with a tiny cheer. Tiny in as much as it makes little difference. Converters for plugs and sockets for electrickery are fairly cheap so that it makes it practical for everyone to carry their own converter. However I must say the principle goes a long way. Better for the consumer as it makes little difference who wins the popular electric tin can race. Think about driving past garage after garage with BMW electric, Audi electric and desperately looking for your Ford electric station before you run out of power driving through Germany.

Hope the principle keeps up and they make their battery packs standard and hot changeable. That would also be great for the consumer. For some reason this charging up in minutes doesn’t sound right to me. Call me paranoid. It takes me ages to charge an AAA battery so why should a much bigger battery be any quicker unless of course it’s expected life is about a month. Mmmmm. Sounds dodgy to me. AAA’s cost enough what is one of these batteries going to cost?

Shiny new toys

Most of us see new technology automatically being better.  It’s seen as new, shiny, sexy and something that you just need.    In many cases it is but not all.   Sometimes I’ve seen electronics or computer programs that add nothing to the old paper or wooden model and some even that cannot do as much as the old version.    Look at jigsaws for example.    What exactly is the point of that?

Over the course of my career I have had several clients looking at installing some new system into their business.  A quick five minutes actually shows that there is a negative ROI on several thousand pounds of investment.    In my report I’ve suggested that they don’t make the expenditure.   Most listen, although some don’t and I’ve delivered the requirement, and I’ve had repeat work from both because they appreciate my work.

But in general I’ve worked on the principle that ‘if it ain’t broke don’t fiddle with it’ making changes only where there is an actual benefit in some form which in company speak means financial and in personal use means financial, time saving and/or something shiny.    Many others do the same which is why so few have moved to Vista.

Because of this mindset I have paper telephone books, home and business, and a diary.   I just don’t find carrying my PDA convenient and because of that the batteries are always dead when I need it.   I can enter any necessary entries into my online diary at my convenience but the paper one is the master.

I have two servers, 4Tb SAN space, a wireless router, two PC’s and several laptops.    The servers are still running NT4 although I have Server 2003 licenses and I also have PHP and Apache on one and MySQL on the other.   Latest versions of all of those.   The clients all are running Windows XP.  I only keep working data on the clients whilst files are stored on the SAN in the appropriate directories.   I have Javascript and ActiveX disabled on most as well to cut down on malware.

As you can imagine I try and avoid MS Outlook to cut down on the malware as well so I’ve a very old version of Eudora.    I bought the license in 1996 so I think I’ve got my moneys worth.   Now I’ve hit some internal limit and it keeps crashing on client startup.  It’s not a total disaster as I can access the mails via the web but I like to store my mails offline.

So now is the time to upgrade my EMail client.  Time for something new, sexy and shiny.

A virus could be our next defence

I’ve always had a bit of difficulty with viruses/virii/virus’s but it seems like they could be our new friends.

Despite our cravings for antibiotics and the ease our doctors seem to hand them out to just shut us up. (My doctor never has. I should sue) Antibiotics have never been the cure for all ills. A miracle drug that has saved untold lives but does not cure everything. Viral infections are one of those immune to antibiotics.

In addition the misuse of antibiotics is what creates all these superbugs that are resistant to antibiotics. A bit like us they can build up immunity if we don’t follow the instructions and people being people stupidity is second nature. This coupled with the fact we inject antibiotics into food animals including fish means we are helping something that wants to evolve and kill us. Unfortunately as with everything else it won’t just kill the people that aided it. It’ll happily kill us all. So much for social justice.

Anyway, a virus itself could be the solution. We can tailor a virus to attack other viruses and the superbugs. Killing them before, hopefully, dying themselves if we do it right. It will bring in a new generation of viral tools to our health armoury and that can only be good.

As an added bonus only one dose is required. Meaning that it makes immunity less likely because of the public not following instructions. That has got to be good as well.

The human brain and wishful thinking

The human brain is a wonderful machine.     It has enabled us to plan, organise and build our way to the the pinnacle of our society.  Earth 1999.   It is a miracle of evolution.

But it is not perfect.   It has an inbuilt error mechanism.  Some that actually provides a positive function, in some ways, intuition and in addition wishful thinkin’.  Read here.   It seems that wishful thinking plays a bigger part in our decision making processes than I realised until now.  Intuition in the mind of the unskilled is merely mental coin tossing while wishful thinking is the way to override facts.

You see I was trying to rationalise the feel good euphoria that has swept the US since Obama came to power.  I didn’t think he would do it because he was new, untried, and had no real policies but he still won.     I was amazed, after the US watching the disaster that was the UK after 11 years of a snake oil salesman and they follow in our footsteps by electing one themselves.   How did that happen?    Don’t they pay attention to what is going on?  Yet after only a few weeks many were watching his policies being implemented in horror.  Even some of his own side were backing away and he hasn’t really had the chance to really screw anything up yet.  Don’t worry though he will.  Wishful thinking that change means good.    Change can be both good and bad.  Good for politicians bad for people for example.

So much for the wisdom of crowds.  A philosophy I believed in up to now.   I’ve now come to realise that marketing and wishful thinking have a bigger impact on our logical processes than you would think possible.    Perfectly reasonable people who work daily with facts and make decisions based on those facts worth millions will ignore facts and go for wishful thinking when their beliefs point in other directions.

Gun control, social justice, child poverty, the poor and the list goes on.   Politicians pull a few strings in speeches by implying things and lying when required and they use key emotive words like ‘Think of the children’ and people allow themselves to be diverted from what logic says and go with their wishful thinking that it is the right thing to do.    Most of the time it does not hold up logically either and due to our poor schooling some don’t even think logically or have enough intellect to see the gaping holes.    In fact they argue that the emperor has clothes where clearly none exists because they want to believe.  They need to and don’t want to discuss it and confuse the issue with facts.

Our socialist government here in the UK has unveiled it’s latest plans for making us all slaves of the state.    It’s mortgaged off our children’s futures.   Children currently being pushed around in prams and learning to walk have debts that will take until they are 30 years old to pay off. Nobody was thinking of the children then and now it’s way to late.  Yet it comes as no surprise every socialist government in the UK ends the same way.   This one is just the worst in history.  How can anyone morally justify slavery in this day and age is beyond my simple mind.

You would think we have learnt from the last few years but we have not.      Our opposition party is based on the same marketing principles and, so as not to upset us too much, is actually selling the same snake oil with a few added ingredients to make it more palatable.     Still the same heavy stodge on the stomach though.       That is why our opposition is barely in the lead in the polls when they are actually in competition with the most hated party ever.  Even core party supporters are objecting to what is going on in both parties.

But you can be sure that next election time the marketing will be in full flow and the core people will fall in line behind their parties as before.  Forgetting completely the lies that were told before with the wishful thinking that ‘They have learnt their lessons’ and ‘It won’t happen again’.  Our logic that says they have lied in every aspect of their time in office pushed aside by wishful thinking that things will be different this time.

In my opinion wishful thinking is the most powerful force on this planet and easily manipulated by unscrupulous people and there is nothing we can do.  You would think after what happened in the 1940s nobody would queue up to take a shower yet I bet most of the UK would if it came down to it.     Like lambs to the slaughter.

On the plus side.  All these things go in cycles, and several things could happen.   We could go back a few steps on the path for our species.  We could revolt.   Politicians could change.   We will likely just go on the way were are.   But regardless, things will change eventually and we will step past this point and go forward again.    Technology will drive it.   I wish I could say I see us learning from the experience we go through but I can’t.  In the distant future the 20th and 21st centuries will go down as a dark bit of history when people were oppressed by governments and socialism was tried and failed miserably several times.   People will learn it in school and then go on and do the same things again because they just know it will be better this time because we just need to try harder.  The last lot were not true believers and it is the right thing to do.

So head down and get inventing something that will save us from governments.   There is a lot still to be discovered.

It’s hard to believe that what causes us the most grief nowadays is our own brains.    Talk about double edged swords.  I don’t see a way around it myself until we are better educated.    Mmmm.  That does explain the current government stance on education though.

Could this mean the end of spam?

Finally something has happened that could prove the death knell for spam.

It appears that sending spam generates 17m tons of CO2.

The whingey whiney greenies have their eyes on you dirty spammers.   Penalties will be severe and the military might of everyone on the planet will be brought to bear.